Author
The Righteous Mind
Why do sincere, decent people reach sharply opposed conclusions about politics, religion, and morality? Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt argues that moral judgment usually begins with rapid intuition, while conscious reasoning often arrives afterward to explain or defend what already feels right. He then presents morality as a plural system: people respond to several concerns—including care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, and liberty—but cultures and political groups assign them different weight. The final part examines humanity’s capacity to form cohesive groups, proposing that the same moral instincts that make cooperation, institutions, and religious communities possible can also produce tribalism and hostility. Combining psychological research, evolutionary argument, anthropology, political analysis, and memorable metaphors, The Righteous Mind offers a framework for interpreting disagreement without assuming that one’s opponents are merely ignorant or malicious. Its cen…