Photo of Peter Singer
Photo: Ula Zarosa · CC BY 2.0 · via source

Author profile

Peter Singer

Australian moral philosopher Peter Singer writes clear, argument-driven works on animal ethics, global poverty, bioethics, altruism and our obligations to others.

1 published book 0 published articles

Official website

About Peter Singer

Peter Singer is an Australian moral philosopher born in Melbourne in 1946. Educated at the University of Melbourne and Oxford, he taught in Australia, Britain and the United States. He spent 25 years as Princeton University’s Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics before retiring from Princeton in 2024.

Singer works chiefly in practical ethics, testing moral principles against choices involving animals, poverty, charitable giving and medicine. His prose is direct and argumentative, often built around memorable cases. In his 1972 essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” for example, a child drowning in a shallow pond becomes the starting point for an argument about helping distant strangers.

Animal Liberation brought his case against disregarding animal suffering to a wide public. Other major works include Practical Ethics, The Life You Can Save and The Most Good You Can Do. Singer was appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia in 2012 and received the Berggruen Prize for Philosophy and Culture in 2021, recognizing the reach of his utilitarian thought and public philosophy.

Start with The Expanding Circle. First published in 1981 and later reissued with a new preface and afterword, it asks how altruism could emerge through evolution yet grow beyond kin and community. Singer’s answer gives reason a central role in widening moral concern. It is a compact introduction to the structure of his thinking and the ambitions behind his wider work.

Published books

Author

The Expanding Circle

Why do human beings help one another, and how can concern extend beyond family, community, or nation? Peter Singer approaches these questions by bringing evolutionary accounts of altruism into conversation with moral philosophy. Biology, he argues, helps explain the origins and limits of many social impulses: natural selection can favor assistance to relatives, reciprocal cooperation, and loyalty within groups. Yet an evolutionary explanation of conduct does not by itself determine how anyone ought to live. Singer assigns a decisive role to reason, whose demand for consistency can expose the arbitrariness of privileging one’s own group simply because it is one’s own. The resulting image is an expanding circle of moral concern, potentially widening from kin and neighbors to distant strangers and nonhuman animals. Originally published amid intense debate over sociobiology, the book remains a compact argument about human nature, impartiality, and whether moral progress is possible.

View book