Social Psychology

How other people shape what we think and do. Philip Zimbardo's The Lucifer Effect revisits the Stanford Prison Experiment to ask how ordinary people come to do terrible things. Robert B. Cialdini's Influence explains persuasion, and Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson's Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) self-justification. Jonathan Haidt's The Happiness Hypothesis and The Righteous Mind explore happiness and moral division, Robert M. Sapolsky's Behave explains behaviour from brain chemistry to culture, and Peter Singer's The Expanding Circle traces how moral concern widens. For readers curious about human nature.

4 published books 0 published articles

Related subcategories

Social Psychology

Groups & Social Influence

How groups and other people change what we think and do. Robert B. Cialdini's Influence explains the everyday principles of persuasion, such as social proof, the tendency to follow what others do, and authority, the pull of experts and uniforms. Philip Zimbardo's The Lucifer Effect shows the dark side of group pressure through his Stanford Prison Experiment, where ordinary students turned cruel in their assigned roles. Two classic books on conformity, persuasion and the power of the situation. See Social Psychology for more.

Explore category

Social Psychology

Cooperation & Conflict

Why do humans cooperate so well, and fight so terribly? Robert M. Sapolsky's Behave explains our best and worst behaviour by tracing it back through the seconds, hours, years and millennia before an act: brain, hormones, childhood, culture and evolution. Peter Singer's The Expanding Circle argues that ethics began with kinship and cooperation and has widened, through reason, to include strangers and other species. Two wide-ranging books on the roots of human behaviour. See Social Psychology for more.

Explore category

Books in this category

Primary category

The Righteous Mind

Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion

By Jonathan Haidt

Why do sincere, decent people reach sharply opposed conclusions about politics, religion, and morality? Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt argues that moral judgment usually begins with rapid intuition, while conscious reasoning often arrives afterward to explain or defend what already feels right. He then presents morality as a plural system: people respond to several concerns—including care, fairness, loyalty, authority, sanctity, and liberty—but cultures and political groups assign them different weight. The final part examines humanity’s capacity to form cohesive groups, proposing that the same moral instincts that make cooperation, institutions, and religious communities possible can also produce tribalism and hostility. Combining psychological research, evolutionary argument, anthropology, political analysis, and memorable metaphors, The Righteous Mind offers a framework for interpreting disagreement without assuming that one’s opponents are merely ignorant or malicious. Its cen…

View book

Primary category

The Happiness Hypothesis

Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom

By Jonathan Haidt

In The Happiness Hypothesis, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt examines enduring claims about happiness, virtue, love, adversity, self-command, and meaningful living. Rather than accepting ancient wisdom as timeless truth—or dismissing it as obsolete—he compares ideas drawn from religious and philosophical traditions with findings from psychology, neuroscience, and evolutionary thought. The book begins with the divided mind, memorably represented as a conscious rider attempting to guide a much larger elephant of automatic feeling and intuition. It then moves outward into reciprocity, self-serving judgment, relationships, circumstances, moral development, sacredness, and purpose. Haidt’s central conclusion is that flourishing is not produced by introspection or pleasure alone. It emerges through a workable alignment among temperament, habits, relationships, commitments, values, and social life. The result is an accessible investigation of what ancient traditions understood about human…

View book

Primary category

Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)

Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts

By Carol Tavris , Elliot Aronson

Why do intelligent, decent people defend poor decisions long after the evidence has turned against them? Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson answer through cognitive dissonance: the discomfort produced when facts or actions collide with a favorable view of oneself. Rather than revise that self-image, people often reinterpret evidence, alter memories, blame others, or intensify their original commitment. The authors trace this machinery of self-justification from private quarrels to professional judgment, criminal investigations, political allegiance, prejudice, and international conflict. Their central warning is not merely that people deceive others, but that sincere self-deception can make error remarkably durable. At the same time, the book argues that defensiveness is not destiny. By separating wrongdoing from a total condemnation of the self, individuals and institutions can become more capable of correcting errors, making meaningful apologies, and learning before a small mistake har…

View book

Primary category

The Lucifer Effect

Understanding How Good People Turn Evil

By Philip Zimbardo

Why do ordinary people sometimes participate in cruelty, humiliation, and organized violence? Social psychologist Philip Zimbardo argues that explanations centered only on defective character—the proverbial “bad apple”—overlook the power of situations and the institutions that construct them. The book’s central case is the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment, in which students assigned to prisoner and guard roles occupied a simulated prison until the study was stopped after six days. Zimbardo uses his account of that project to examine conformity, obedience, deindividuation, role absorption, moral disengagement, and the diffusion of responsibility. He then connects these processes to abuses at Abu Ghraib prison and to broader instances of institutional wrongdoing. Although the Stanford study’s methods and interpretation have since faced substantial scholarly criticism, the book remains influential as an argument about how systems distribute power and normalize misconduct. Its final moveme…

View book

Articles in this category

No published articles are currently connected to this category in this language.